From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] capability-based design (Re: permissions idea)
In-Reply-To: <20011004220526.15E61199BB@mail.cse.psu.edu>
References: <20011004220526.15E61199BB@mail.cse.psu.edu>
From: Richard <greon@best.com>
Message-Id: <E15pHvp-0002Gq-00@localhost>
Date: Thu,  4 Oct 2001 16:29:33 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fd9f2a98-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk writes:
>in what way(s) do "capa" and eros improve on
>(say) CAP or ten15?

I do not know.  a google search on cap ten15 yields
nothing immediately informative.  since capability-based
OSes have been around since the 70s, I'm guessing they
are capability-based OSes or programming environments.

I used "capa" as short for "capability-based".