From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Plan9 and Ada95?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 05 Nov 2001 14:40:55."
             <20011105143517.77FB0199B5@mail.cse.psu.edu>
References: <20011105143517.77FB0199B5@mail.cse.psu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1847.1004972338.1@starfruit.iw3d.co.uk>
From: Theo Honohan <theo@ideaworks3d.com>
Message-Id: <E160lDH-0000Tp-00@starfruit.iw3d.co.uk>
Date: Mon,  5 Nov 2001 14:58:58 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 143f965c-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

forsyth@vitanuova.com wrote:
> >>GNAT would probably come fairly cheaply once we had a port of GCC 3.0.
>
> i think that's the first time i've seen `cheaply' adjacent to `gcc'.

Well, that's relativity for you.