From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: postmaster@cjl1.demon.co.uk
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
In-Reply-To: <ad2ded07f58529b1dcfebe94b3f74ad9@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] replica (was: ipv6)
User-Agent: Demon-WebMail/2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E17Ck2F-000PzV-0W@anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 17:41:23 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9e6fe430-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Could there be a problem if pull has already opened the file
and is copying it at the time an update is written to it.
pull would have got the metadata of the file pre update.
I'm assuming your local updates are faster than remote pulls
so local update writes can 'overtake' the reads of a remote pull.

Unlikely I know, but possible?

Chris.