9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@swtch.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Forward option for Mail
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:27:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1AW3zb-00024y-PD@t40.swtch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:47:30 PST." <77cfdf8935c75cce2ed4d9e152cfc70e@centurytel.net>

> I added a Forward option for acme/mail. I've been using it a few days. I
> was careful to leave the Q/Reply/all behavior unchanged.

I'd rather find a way to unify Forward and Reply.
Rob already pointed out that this is way too much text in the tags.
What does Forward do differently from Reply?
Looks like it prints "Fwd: " instead of "Re: " in the
subject line.

Do you really forward enough mail that it's more
work to double-click on "Re" and type "Fwd"
than it was to do all this editing?

If we don't put Forward in the tag, then clicking Reply,
then double-click "Re", then type "Fwd" is still less
work than typing "Forward" and clicking on it.

Perhaps there should be a way to set the default
Mail tags, and then Forward would be a little easier
to stomach, and you could have |spell (probably
Edit ,>spell) and Undo.  But I'm very wary of that too.
Using Unix software way too much over the last few
months, I have been reminded daily of the first
lesson I learned from Rob: adding interface options is
no substitute for getting the interface right to begin with.

Russ


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-12-16  1:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-15  8:47 Skip Tavakkolian
2003-12-15  9:04 ` rob pike, esq.
2003-12-15 10:17   ` Skip Tavakkolian
2003-12-15 16:53     ` Rob Pike
2003-12-15 10:28   ` Skip Tavakkolian
2003-12-16  1:27 ` Russ Cox [this message]
2003-12-16  1:53   ` Jim Choate
2003-12-16  1:52     ` Russ Cox
2003-12-16  2:56       ` Jim Choate
2003-12-16  7:26   ` Skip Tavakkolian
2003-12-16 13:38     ` Jim Choate
2003-12-16 13:47       ` Axel Belinfante
2003-12-16 14:16         ` Lucio De Re
2003-12-16 14:12           ` Russ Cox
2003-12-17  2:10           ` Charles Forsyth
2003-12-17 11:16             ` David Lukes
2003-12-17  6:06       ` Skip Tavakkolian
2003-12-17  5:14         ` andrey mirtchovski
2003-12-17  6:41           ` Skip Tavakkolian
2003-12-17  8:20             ` andrey mirtchovski
2003-12-16 14:36 David Presotto
2003-12-16 14:15 ` Russ Cox
2003-12-16 15:05 ` David Presotto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1AW3zb-00024y-PD@t40.swtch.com \
    --to=rsc@swtch.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).