From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] kfs performance 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 03 Mar 2004 09:48:56."
             <418ebcba5700419ea957ef3bf7392b19@juice.thebigchoice.com> 
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@swtch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <61172.1078341308.1@t40.swtch.com>
Message-Id: <E1Aybpo-000Fug-UQ@t40.swtch.com>
Date: Wed,  3 Mar 2004 14:15:08 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 10e17e8c-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> "For metadata intensive benchmarks this improves performance by more than a f
> actor of two when compared to the conventional syncronous write approach"
> 
> hget http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/papers/CSE-TR-254-95/CSE-TR-254-95.ps

except that extracting a 200MB file is anything but metadata intensive.