From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Skip Tavakkolian Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 18:23:11 -0800 References: <1417410858.1852249.197150289.78A68333@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1417423412.1914203.197194673.02F8E8C7@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20141202005623.Horde.7OYyDZ5A8-3_91Rj2J4RKw1@ssl.eumx.net> In-Reply-To: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] Porting plan9 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 30f725c6-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Where is the +1 on this whatchamajig? Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 1, 2014, at 6:16 PM, Steven Stallion wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: >> Quoting Steven Stallion : >> >>> FWIW, u-boot is not a net-negative at all. For SoC's it simplifies >>> boot significantly - there is zero reason to eschew the functionality >>> it brings. >> >> Instead, I'll recommend eschewing hardware that requires circus tricks to >> load a kernel. > > Clearly you've never worked on hardware. >