From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <E562FCEE3A42D61192880002A5FB433353179C@kite.pigroup.co.uk>
From: Stephen Parker <stephen.parker@pitechnology.com>
To: "'9fans@cse.psu.edu'" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: RE: [9fans] bitsy uvlong & suspend are fine, thanks.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C27EA7.35D6E830"
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:26:54 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0ff7769a-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_000_01C27EA7.35D6E830
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

It is I who also has a non-suspending bitsy.  My bootloader is
2.18.45.

stephen



------_=_NextPart_000_01C27EA7.35D6E830
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Description: Re: [9fans] bitsy uvlong & suspend are fine, thanks.

Message-ID: <200210281600.g9SG0o123154@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl>
From: Axel Belinfante <Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl>
Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] bitsy uvlong & suspend are fine, thanks.
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:00:50 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

Any idea what (other) effects it would have I would downgrade to
a boot loader version that is close(r) to yours?

I recall that someone else (I'm sorry, forgot your name) mentioned
that suspend/resume never worked.
Question for you and others who also have suspend/resume problems:
do you also have a ``recent'' boot loader?

Axel.

> It seems that at 2.16.x they changed to boot loader to suspend/boot
> both linux and WinCE. So, it looks like our suspend code doesn't
> work for those boot loaders (since we have everything else the same). Sic.


------_=_NextPart_000_01C27EA7.35D6E830--