From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jas@corpus-callosum.com (Jeff Sickel) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:45:35 -0500 Subject: [9fans] drawterm bug In-Reply-To: <6223ef47198082d6b74693b16a82846b@ladd.quanstro.net> References: <6a7e42f7236652d4761e22c1159e92db@ladd.quanstro.net> <6223ef47198082d6b74693b16a82846b@ladd.quanstro.net> Message-ID: Topicbox-Message-UUID: be878406-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Mar 22, 2011, at 9:40 AM, erik quanstrom wrote: > hg is a pain, so the drawterm-fixes patch queue broke as > soon as russ pulled in some changes. i'll try to work out > how to get this up while causing minimal chaos. I've found that using hg mq stacks of patches are a pain. But that's just my experience with the tool. It's all too easy to think that a patch is applied out of some mq managed stack just to find that it clearly is not once attempting to submit it upstream. Pull, try to update just to realize that you've got to hg qpop -a first, then remember to stuff things back in the right order. Needs work, well, time, it takes time. -jas