From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618)
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Message-Id: <F8B3825C-C791-11D8-8645-000D93AE5C94@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-440210415
From: Andrew Pochinsky <avp@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: [9fans] SXM and Plan 9
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 11:57:56 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: af0ab93e-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025


--Apple-Mail-1-440210415
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=US-ASCII;
	format=flowed

SXM is almost a complete R5RS implementation (it's major omission is 
lack of bignums and rational numbers). I ported it to plan9. In my 
typical code it runs about two times slower than petite, but your 
milage may vary.

--andrew


 > From: Vester Thacker <vthacker@0xfe.org>
 > Date: June 26, 2004 6:38:27 AM CDT
 >Subject: [9fans] SXM and Plan 9
 >
 >
 >Has anyone used SMX with Plan 9? I'm interested to hear whether it
 >is a good implementation of Scheme under Plan 9. Or should I consider
 >another version? Any schemers out there? Thanks in advance.
 >
 >--Vester Thacker
 >

--Apple-Mail-1-440210415
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="upas-qxwknaplxkgwdrkkhjeeojclkr"
Content-Disposition: inline

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--upas-qxwknaplxkgwdrkkhjeeojclkr
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

from postmaster@ethel:
The following attachment had content that we can't
prove to be harmless.  To avoid possible automatic
execution, we changed the content headers.
The original header was:

	Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
	Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=US-ASCII
--upas-qxwknaplxkgwdrkkhjeeojclkr
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="file.suspect"

<bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>SXM is almost a complete
R5RS implementation (it's major omission is lack of bignums and
rational numbers). I ported it to plan9. In my typical code it runs
about two times slower than petite, but your milage may vary.


--andrew



> From: </color></bold>Vester Thacker <<vthacker@0xfe.org>

<bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>> Date: </color></bold>June
26, 2004 6:38:27 AM CDT

<bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>>Subject: </color>[9fans]
SXM and Plan 9

<color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>></color></bold>

>

>Has anyone used SMX with Plan 9? I'm interested to hear whether it

>is a good implementation of Scheme under Plan 9. Or should I consider

>another version? Any schemers out there? Thanks in advance.

>

>--Vester Thacker

>


--upas-qxwknaplxkgwdrkkhjeeojclkr--
--Apple-Mail-1-440210415--