From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
In-Reply-To: <0644155cf9156095a99518f19429373d@terzarima.net>
References: <0644155cf9156095a99518f19429373d@terzarima.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <FC5B54BE-4EB2-11D9-901F-00112430C042@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: jim <jim.whitson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Acme mailreader
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:04:22 +0000
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 17a40978-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025


On 15 Dec 2004, at 15:58, Charles Forsyth wrote:

> upas/fs centralises the parsing (and access to mail storage),
> so that neither acme mail nor upas/nedmail need to do quite
> as much parsing as most mail readers

Very nice ;-). Are upas/fs as yet unported for some technical reason,
or just for want of time? The techniques you speak of seem extremely
interesting (not to mention useful!).