From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <FF5746F58B0BB7F23AE0B662311458D3@5ess.inri.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:48:17 -0500
From: sl@9front.org
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: CAJQ9t7gC2Baf-9xkCxP7iYzixSahnjpyVr-4=nGUOq3B8FEz_A@mail.gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] There is no fork
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cf1dad88-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> On 2/10/18, Benjamin Huntsman <BHuntsman@mail2.cu-portland.edu> wrote:
>> Just curious as to the state of the union.  Is 9front pretty much the de
>> facto "official" Plan 9 these days, or does anyone still use or maintain any
>> of the following:
>
> I'm with David (legacy), nearly all the way.
>
> That said, I deem it unfortunate that there isn't a drive to
> consolidate the various flavours of Plan 9 into a single offering, or
> at least identify and discuss the differences and provide for the
> choices from a single source (pun intended).

Have you considered providing this service?

sl