From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Nigel Roles" <nigel@9fs.org>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: RE: [9fans] /sys/include/ape/errno.h
Message-ID: <HOEHIDJJJINMLFPOLFJCMEDPDFAA.nigel@9fs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401060821340.29690-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
Date: Tue,  6 Jan 2004 16:41:48 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b32a474c-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Lucio De Re wrote:
>> is not consistent with BSD.  I also miss EWOULDBLOCK and ECONNRESET,
>> although I confess I did not search very far for them, so if they are
>> to be found elsewhere, please point them out to me.
>
> well, keeping them different may keep SCO out of our hair. I thought
> at one time I would say this in jest, but I was wrong.
>
> ron

Oh no; a trivial change from the original source confirms guilt surely?