在 2012年11月28日星期三UTC+8下午8时22分30秒，Bence Fábián写道：
> but what is _most_ likely is that you really have them initialized two times.
> just do
> g '(op|et)names ?='
>
> you should find 4 initializations. just delete the redundant ones.
>
>
> 2012/11/28 Bence Fábián <beg...@gmail.com>
>
> DATA  opnames<1>+116(SB)/4,$string<1>+739(SB)
>
> and
> DATA  etnames<1)+72(SB)/4,$string<1>+912(SB)
>
>
>
>
> are the second initializations of both opnames and etnames.
>
> you can grep for them in the output of
> 8c -S source.c
>
>
> that's all i can help, cause i can't tell what $string<1>+739(SB) and $string<1>+912(SB) refer to
>
>
> since they are adresses.

Thanks guys, I just look into the list, and suprisingly saw you replying in
a new thread, I am not familiar with newsgroup and didn't saw your reply earlier
the problem is solved. It's a good lesson, eyes can lie, I just didn't use machine to check duplicated initializaion.