From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] tactic In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 01 Apr 2004 17:08:07 +0100." <1080835687.17780.568.camel@zevon> From: Tad Hunt Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 10:24:58 -0800 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4d1b1b56-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 In message <1080835687.17780.568.camel@zevon>, Dave Lukes said: ;I've yet to see anything that works better than SpamAssassin ;in a "real" situation (i.e. no "please confirm ..." etc.) I find that spamassassin sucked rocks for filtering my email. I am currently using CRM114: http://crm114.sourceforge.net/ The drawback is that you have to train it before it works very well. In the beginning it's about 50%, but after the first week or two it has been well above 98% for me. It usually miss classifies a few messages out of about 150+/day for me. I should note that 3/4 of my email is actually SPAM, so I'm pretty happy with it. -Tad