From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Conor Williams" <conor.williams@openet-telecom.com>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: RE: [9fans] Tcl 7.6
Message-ID: <NIEKLJFNACLCBEJIFMELCEOKCBAA.conor.williams@openet-telecom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20040111210908.A4316@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:44:39 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b7190dc0-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

hi
I ported 8.3.5 before - http://www.geocities.com/will5514
for me a lot of the "network tests" failed because the loopback
address 127.0.0.1 was not defined in plan 9, but they do work
regards
will551

-----Original Message-----
From: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu [mailto:9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu]On Behalf
Of Lucio De Re
Sent: 11 January 2004 19:09
To: 9fans mailing list
Subject: [9fans] Tcl 7.6


For some reason, I chose to port the old release of Tcl to Plan 9,
rather than the most recent with all the new features.

It fails a number of tests, mostly to do with exec and out of the
ordinary file I/O (pipes, sockets and the like), but it does pass
a surprising number of them.

Should anyone feel that the skinny version of Tcl is worth having,
please contact me.

++L