From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] spam rejection after reception does have limits
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:14:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <O5Gcnf6uTtppTuuiXTWJhQ@comcast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <029701c385b0$686b32e0$b9844051@insultant.net>
boyd, rounin wrote:
> that's why we don't use 2DES, 'cos there is theoretical attack where
> you meet in the the middle. sure, it's costly, but the solution is to go
> to 3DES. DES 'died' back in the early '90s (unless you were the NSA,
> where it probably died well before that).
DES was never authorized for protecting classified information
(except in a true emergency). AES, however, is authorized for
two levels of protection (e.g. SECRET in an unclassified
environment), and since AES is much faster than 3DES it seems
a much better choice.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-29 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-27 22:46 ron minnich
2003-09-28 1:11 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 9:08 ` Charles Forsyth
2003-09-28 9:16 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 8:10 ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-28 8:59 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 9:42 ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-28 10:18 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 10:50 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 11:18 ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-28 11:44 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 11:05 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 11:47 ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-28 11:58 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 12:17 ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-29 9:14 ` Douglas A. Gwyn [this message]
2003-09-29 9:37 ` boyd
2003-09-28 15:33 ` ron minnich
2003-09-28 15:39 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 17:12 ` ron minnich
2003-09-28 17:22 ` boyd
2003-09-28 10:16 ` Charles Forsyth
2003-09-28 10:23 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-29 3:23 ` salomo3
2003-09-29 3:32 ` boyd
2003-09-29 5:18 ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-29 9:18 ` boyd
2003-09-29 13:53 ` Joel Salomon
2003-09-29 9:14 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-09-29 9:13 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-09-29 9:44 ` SPAM: " Charles Forsyth
2003-09-29 15:21 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-09-29 16:02 ` Joel Salomon
2003-09-29 21:24 ` boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=O5Gcnf6uTtppTuuiXTWJhQ@comcast.com \
--to=dagwyn@null.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).