Re: [9fans] status of the ide pseudo worm patches

Re: [9fans] status of the ide pseudo worm patches

[jmk]

On Fri Apr 27 23:22:22 EDT 2001, sam@ducksworth.com wrote:
> have the ide pseudo worm patches been rolled into
> latest release?
>
> --sam

no.

Re: [9fans] status of the ide pseudo worm patches

[Sam Ducksworth]

ok thanks i will dig around the archives for the patches.

On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:

> On Fri Apr 27 23:22:22 EDT 2001, sam@ducksworth.com wrote:
> > have the ide pseudo worm patches been rolled into
> > latest release?
> >
> > --sam
>
> no.
>

--sam

Re: [9fans] status of the ide pseudo worm patches

[jmk]

On Sat Apr 28 12:37:48 EDT 2001, sam@ducksworth.com wrote:
> thanks jim. is there any info on the other file server project
> or is it too soon to talk about it?

too soon, and not really for me to say.

Re: [9fans] status of the ide pseudo worm patches

[Sam Ducksworth]

thanks jim. is there any info on the other file server project
or is it too soon to talk about it?

On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:

> On Sat Apr 28 11:29:37 EDT 2001, sam@ducksworth.com wrote:
> >
> > based on this and other information that i have gathered the
> > answer seems to be no. so based on that i have another question.
> >
> > will this functionality (ide pseudo worm) be included in the
> > 9p20?? (4th edition)?
> >
>
> I don't intend to make any changes to the version of the fileserver code
> you should have now, and it doesn't have any IDE support.
>
> The 9P2000 fileserver, which I am again working on now that update
> is out of the way, is planned to support any device the cpu/terminal
> kernel has. Of course, by the time I'm finished all this may be moot
> as there is another (separate) fileserver project underway which may
> subsume the Plan 9 one.
>

--sam

Re: [9fans] status of the ide pseudo worm patches

[jmk]

On Sat Apr 28 11:29:37 EDT 2001, sam@ducksworth.com wrote:
>
> based on this and other information that i have gathered the
> answer seems to be no. so based on that i have another question.
>
> will this functionality (ide pseudo worm) be included in the
> 9p20?? (4th edition)?
>

I don't intend to make any changes to the version of the fileserver code
you should have now, and it doesn't have any IDE support.

The 9P2000 fileserver, which I am again working on now that update
is out of the way, is planned to support any device the cpu/terminal
kernel has. Of course, by the time I'm finished all this may be moot
as there is another (separate) fileserver project underway which may
subsume the Plan 9 one.

Re: [9fans] status of the ide pseudo worm patches

[Sam Ducksworth]

perhaps my previous request was not clear. i was refering
to the latest _full_ release. i was not refering to any
of the updates. in fact i just discoverd the latest update
this morning, and am in the process of reviewing the changelog.

based on this and other information that i have gathered the
answer seems to be no. so based on that i have another question.

will this functionality (ide pseudo worm) be included in the
9p20?? (4th edition)?


On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk wrote:

> there is a link to a summary of the changes in the update, next to the link for the patch
>
>

--sam

Re: [9fans] status of the ide pseudo worm patches

[forsyth]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 93 bytes --]

there is a link to a summary of the changes in the update, next to the link for the patch


[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1807 bytes --]

From: Sam Ducksworth <sam@ducksworth.com>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: [9fans] status of the ide pseudo worm patches
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 20:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0104272016030.55767-100000@lucifer.ducksworth.com>

have the ide pseudo worm patches been rolled into
latest release?

--sam

[9fans] status of the ide pseudo worm patches

[Sam Ducksworth]

have the ide pseudo worm patches been rolled into
latest release?

--sam