From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:09:30 -1000 From: Tim Newsham To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] mail questions In-Reply-To: <18922f27aeceafa670c459b89c81b7d0@voidness.de> Message-ID: References: <18922f27aeceafa670c459b89c81b7d0@voidness.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Topicbox-Message-UUID: 07b074a0-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 >> ;upas/send -d -a -h mymachine.dom net!smtp.myserver.dom >> account-on-server dest-user@sest-system.dom > > Do you really tried upas/send this way (or is this a typo)? Yes, that line is from the wiki. Looks like "smtp" is what they meant. Looks like upas/smtp doesnt like getting 'net!$smtp' as an address. I hardwired my smtp gateway into /mail/bin/remotemail and got passed the x509 certificate bits (added -a so that it knows to use ssl, and added the cert to the proper file). Now it seems like it should be succeeding, but that the smtp program is confused: p9term Feb 11 19:02:01 delivery to smtp.gmail.com failed: 250-smtp.gmail.com at your service 250-SIZE 20971520 250-8BITMIME 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN 250 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES The smtp host is saying "everything's good" and upas is saying "failed." Is anyone currently using gmail's smtp service? Tim N. PS. My /sys/src/cmd/upas/* and corresponding /bin/* are up to date.