From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:56:37 -1000 From: Tim Newsham To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: <202b36ec0f14adf4b09e53052147ccc8@brasstown.quanstro.net> Message-ID: References: <20100325114948.GA7249@polynum.com> <31C84C15-2EE3-46CA-BE9F-48F20886ADF7@fastmail.fm> <202b36ec0f14adf4b09e53052147ccc8@brasstown.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [9fans] Man pages for add-ons Topicbox-Message-UUID: f5f2aa8e-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 >> Also, is the size of the namespace list an issue? > > how does history(1) work in the face of a complicated namespace? > we get buy now because the rules are pretty simple. Hmm.. your scripts to setup your namespace also exist in the wayback machine, no? Perhaps this is a good argument for http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/~baford/vxa/ ? > what google uses for its search tables or custom applications > might not be that interesting in the context of a general purpose > operating system. I'm just pointing out that searching unorganized files is another alternative. I'm not sold on this approach, myself. > - erik Tim Newsham | www.thenewsh.com/~newsham | thenewsh.blogspot.com