From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:57:27 -1000
From: Tim Newsham <newsham@lava.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.64.1004280750270.14121@malasada.lava.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.64.1004280757130.14121@malasada.lava.net>
References: <5fa9fbfe115a9cd5a81d0feefe413192@quintile.net>
	<Pine.BSI.4.64.1004280750270.14121@malasada.lava.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [9fans] A simple experiment
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 11934ca8-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

My apologies, I didn't notice you had used fcp as well.  Oops.

On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Tim Newsham wrote:

>> I admit I am surprised by how much a difference there is, it should
>> be just Tread and Rread headers shouldn't it?
>
> If you have high latency or high bandwidth, the maximum message
> size for the 9p messages will be too small to keep the pipe full
> if you're using read serially. Did you take a look at how much
> bandwith was actually in use during your tests?
>
>> -Steve
>
> Tim Newsham | www.thenewsh.com/~newsham | thenewsh.blogspot.com
>
>

Tim Newsham | www.thenewsh.com/~newsham | thenewsh.blogspot.com