From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrey A Mirtchovski <aam396@mail.usask.ca>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Rant (was Re: Plan9 and Ada95?)
In-Reply-To: <3BECE564.224BA32A@zip.com.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10111100237110.9223-100000@ultra5a.usask.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 02:39:30 -0600
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1d66eb2c-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Matthew Hannigan wrote:

>
> dhog says
> > cycle, you want that compile step to complete in a reasonable time.
> > Plan 9's compiler beats GCC hands down on this one.
>
> numbers?  don't disblieve you, but by how much does it beat it?
> even rought estimates would be nice
>

enough!

p9 compilers are twice as fast as gcc compiling code on same hardware...

gcc code is 5% faster than p9 compiled code on same hardware when it comes
to rendering povray images.


andrey