From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: FODEMESI Gergely <fgergo@eik.bme.hu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: RE: [9fans] g++
In-Reply-To: <2c45af7b985c5fcc1e3bcf51edbbd9e4@mightycheese.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.50L0.0309142148430.455-100000@goliat>
References: <2c45af7b985c5fcc1e3bcf51edbbd9e4@mightycheese.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:57:06 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 350a22a6-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025



On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, rob pike, esq. wrote:

...
> implementing it using o-o so difficult you get monstrosities like the
> STL or lose all compile-time type safety, as with all the casting
> through Object in Java.  don't know much about the generics in the new
...

I suppose it wasn't rob but bwk, who wrote:
"It is a testament to the fundamental soundness of the STL design that
these changes required only substituting ...."
tpop, p81

I've been always wondering who wrote this.

 gergo

ps: tpop.awl.com