From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:39:16 -0400
From: ISHWAR RATTAN <rattan@cps.cmich.edu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9port: threadid() etc.
In-Reply-To: <ee9e417a0610171437p1389877bvdb56db4ac175e78c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0610172036190.22686@cps-kurali.cps.cmich.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0610171723350.22620@cps-kurali.cps.cmich.edu>
	<ee9e417a0610171437p1389877bvdb56db4ac175e78c@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cbaf0c44-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025



On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Russ Cox wrote:

> If you are talking about the port to Unix:
> Threadid exists.  Threadpid does not,

For threadid(), the compiler 9c complainsabout implicit
declaration of threadid(), so, I checked in the header file
there is no prototype for threadid() and linker can't find it.
I did include <thread.h>..

-ishwar

> because it does not make sense
> (multiple procs might share the same pid,
> so using the pid to identify a proc is a
> road to disaster).
>
> Russ
>