From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] Re: architectures
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:35:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010712153305.9367f-100000@einstein.ssz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200107121302.PAA24298@boris.cd.chalmers.se>
It's not a question of 'tech savvy' it's a question of mental process,
levels of indirection and abstraction. Those are biological factors and
can't be taught. If you got it you can improve it, if you ain't you ain't.
I speak from spending 7 years in a hands-on science museum trying to
explain a host of technologies to folks. Most folks are not techie and
can't be. Most 'techie' folks really aren't either. They get a vague idea
of the process and work from that, they never get a deep inside intuitive
grasp of process and principle.
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Laura Creighton wrote:
> There are some things you cannot teach the technically unsavvy. For
> instance, in 20 years I have never, ever, ever, been able to convince
> people that floating point, despite looking like decimal fractions,
> ISNT, and that you MUST NEVER USE IT FOR MONEY. The damn fools listen
> politely and then go back to using it, because, after all, they think
> they know better than you do. Moth to the flame. But I have worked
> with 8-year-olds and 80-year-olds, secretaries, hairdressers, and
> supermarket-check-out clerks, the most non-technical people we could
> hope to find since we advertized for them. And after they get some
> familiarity with vi, I can teach nearly all of them how to use regular
> expressions. And just like the technically savvy, they think that
> regular expressions are wonderful.
--
____________________________________________________________________
Nature and Nature's laws lay hid in night:
God said, "Let Tesla be", and all was light.
B.A. Behrend
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-12 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-12 5:22 [9fans] architectures anothy
2001-07-12 8:04 ` Matt
2001-07-12 10:12 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-12 13:01 ` Laura Creighton
2001-07-12 20:35 ` Jim Choate [this message]
2001-07-12 21:41 ` [9fans] architectures Dan Cross
2001-07-12 22:09 ` Jim Choate
2001-07-13 14:52 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-07-13 15:15 ` Boyd Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.3.96.1010712153305.9367f-100000@einstein.ssz.com \
--to=ravage@ssz.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).