From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sah@borf.com
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 07:28:33 -0400
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] oddity
In-Reply-To: <008e01bff1f3$4b540e10$618c1e18@san.rr.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10007200726020.866-100000@linux.borf.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e7348498-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Yes, the standalone runs fine.  Since the 3c509 was questioned, I put
both i82559's in the test terminal and the auth/cpu server.  The
fileserver is using an i82557.  Still, the same game.

Sam

On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Eric Dorman wrote:

> > I've my fileserver and auth/cpu server up now, and am attempting to boot
> > terminals.  The terminal sets to boot from ether0, finds its kernel from
> > the network, and starts to boot.  It then hangs.
> [xx]
> this sounds like terminal hardware weirdness.  i get something similar
> when my ne2000-clone ethernet is somehow screwed up or has the
> wrong irq.  
> 
> can the terminals run the distribution standalone?
> 
> > Sam
> 
> --eric
> 
>