From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] more extensions In-Reply-To: <3D3456EA.4B0BC1D4@gsyc.escet.urjc.es> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 12:26:27 -0400 Topicbox-Message-UUID: cdf66170-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 My next thought, but I figured I'd used all my contribution credits today. Sam On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, FJ Ballesteros wrote: > > Including tuples (perhaps as an instance of nameless structs) would > simplify many interfaces, right? that's one thing I learned using > Limbo. > > The extension would probably be not too complex, also. > > I don't have time to implement this during this semester, but would > be willing to do so in the future if people from the Labs agree. > > Is there agreement on this? >