From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sam <sah@softcardsystems.com>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0302021234470.2729-100000@athena>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: [9fans] Ken's cw fs
Date: Sun,  2 Feb 2003 12:55:01 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4d1325e2-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Regarding the cache, was there any specific reason we
ended up with ten buckets per block?  This puts the
number of Centry per bucket at 204 using 16K RBUFSIZE.

Using a 4K RBUFSIZE, what performance (dis)?advantages
are there in selecting the BKPERBLK scalar?  Presumably
we want to maximize CEPERBK?

Cheers,

Sam