From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] EROS, Vapour
In-Reply-To: <3b87fb54@news.bezeqint.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108290837050.25871-100000@snaresland.acl.lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 08:37:39 -0600
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e7ac31c2-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Eyal Lotem wrote:

> Do you think the increased backwards compatability of Plan9 is worth the
> lack of advantages such as a pure capability system, orthogonal
> persistence, and in the case of Vapour, extreme performance and utter
> safety?

say, is this set of things you list stuff you have used from your personal
experience or the glossy brochures?

ron