From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Choate To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] u9fs re-release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:41:04 -0600 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2f0a1998-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Russ Cox wrote: > > It strikes me as being very close, at least in intent, to the BSD > > licence. I concur with those who believe that having as few > > variations as possible from a small set of fundamental "Open Source" > > licences is good for the community in general and bad for lawyers, > > so in my opinion this particular licence should explicitly model > > itself on the BSD one. > > The point of this was NOT to reopen haggling over licensing. > Bell Labs has been using that boilerplate since before the term > "open source" existed. It's not like the wording was written from > scratch yesterday. > > Please please PLEASE don't continue this thread. We'll all just > have filled mailboxes and nothing useful to show for it. That's funny since you're the one who opened with a jab... -- ____________________________________________________________________ We don't see things as they are, ravage@ssz.com we see them as we are. www.ssz.com jchoate@open-forge.org Anais Nin www.open-forge.org --------------------------------------------------------------------