From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Cc: <hangar18-general@open-forge.org>, <hell@einstein.ssz.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: The new ridiculous license
In-Reply-To: <20030621091652.GB24882@folly>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0306210853560.1657-100000@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 08:56:46 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d51c6570-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025


On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Markus Friedl wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:46:21PM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
> > Why can't Lucent just release Plan 9 under a GPL?
>
> because the GPL would not help when trying to replace gcc....

I find that line of reasoning more than specious.


 --
    ____________________________________________________________________

      We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
      are going to spend the rest of our lives.

                              Criswell, "Plan 9 from Outer Space"

      ravage@ssz.com                            jchoate@open-forge.org
      www.ssz.com                               www.open-forge.org
    --------------------------------------------------------------------