From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ish Rattan <ishwar@pali.cps.cmich.edu>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Again..
In-Reply-To: <d296eccb2a4b343d880c4dc9a2e0feb9@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0205091524100.4452-100000@pali.cps.cmich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Thu,  9 May 2002 15:33:09 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8d42a3b4-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Thu, 9 May 2002, Russ Cox wrote:

> I use drawterm via netkey occasionally (I try not to,
> since it's not encrypted yet) and have no problems.
Does not work for me. Could it be a netkey program generation
problem? It generates correct keys for v3 cpu/auth standalone.

> Presumably password-based drawterm works to your standalone
> server.  Does it work if you log in as someone other
> than the auth domain user (bootes in the examples)?
I tried for user glenda (drawterm -c server-address):
?can't connect to AS: connect AUTHSERV!567 failed: connection refused

user[glenda]

Looks like that I will keep using v3 cpu/auth server.

-ishwar