From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrey mirtchovski To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] GCC3.0 [Was; Webbrowser] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 22:40:05 -0700 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5070c94c-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp wrote: > Cordially, I must say this is not scientific. ? > > I think the speed is not the main matter of Plan 9, anyway. Yes, you're right, they are not scientific. I forgot the smiley at the end --> :) plan9 may not be about speed, but it's so much fun to measure the lack thereof... after all I wasn't going to send my results to the list, but since the GCC discussion started, I decided it was a nice example of its use... The least of my desires was to judge plan9 based on the results of this 'benchmark'.. andrey