From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] GCC3.0 [Was; Webbrowser]
In-Reply-To: <7256bf2df02af553e48028e5332340bf@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302061116350.11322-100000@carotid.ccs.lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Thu,  6 Feb 2003 11:17:26 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 521f0240-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, David Presotto wrote:

> I was under the impression that Dong and I had fixed the TCP problems LANL was
> having.  Is this incorrect?  Could you tell me what's still slow?  I really
> do want our IP stack to stay competative.  Our next move is to take advantage
> of the hardware checksuming on the gigabit boards since, in our most recent
> testing, we seem to differ from BSD speeds most because of that.

David, thanks for the note, and once I manage to stand some Plan 9 nodes
back up, we'll try it again. Sorry I am being so non-specific.

ron