From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: andrey mirtchovski <mirtchov@cpsc.ucalgary.ca>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] execute bits
In-Reply-To: <7EA4C773-A5C2-11D7-B59D-000393A941BC@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306231537520.16694-100000@fbsd.cpsc.ucalgary.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 15:41:27 -0600
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d85490dc-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Kenji Arisawa wrote:

> Yes, but that is troublesome. I think that should be fixed.
>

the whole idea of disk/kfscmd allow is that no permission bits are checked,
including execution bits.

one should avoid having the system in an 'allowed' state as much as
possible. as I understand it, the fix is to do

	disk/kfscmd disallow

:)