9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ron minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Rstat needs three size fields?
Date: Tue,  8 Jul 2003 08:14:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307080812450.25149-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <009d01c3454a$2b1ca5a0$d2944251@insultant.net>

On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, boyd, rounin wrote:

> > Another common strategy that I've used is to double up until to
> > threshold, and then extend by a constant chunk size after that.  For
> > instance, you might double things until you get to, say, a megabyte,
> > and then add on a megabyte after that.
>
> yeah, that's not a bad idea, but it depends on what you're trying to
> allocate etc ...  defining the 'threshold' and the 'chunk size' is the
> hard part.

If the stuff is files, you can depend on some things. Every time I check a
file system I find the lovely bimodal size distribution. You can start
with 32K or some nominal such size and you'll cover most of the files;
past that point things are "big" so you can start allocating reasonably
big chunks.

That's how I've done it anyways, unless I pre-computed the size.

ron



  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-08 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-30 18:04 Sam
2003-06-30 19:08 ` ron minnich
2003-06-30 19:15   ` boyd, rounin
2003-07-04  3:18 ` Russ Cox
2003-07-04 15:04   ` Sam
2003-07-04 17:13     ` rob pike, esq.
2003-07-07  8:33       ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-07-07  9:03         ` Geoff Collyer
2003-07-07 15:10           ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-07-08  0:49             ` ron minnich
2003-07-07 15:50           ` rob pike, esq.
2003-07-07 20:38             ` boyd, rounin
2003-07-07 21:18               ` rog
2003-07-07 21:28                 ` boyd, rounin
2003-07-07 23:23                   ` [9fans] simple, sufficient rog
2003-07-07 20:54             ` [9fans] Rstat needs three size fields? Geoff Collyer
2003-07-09  2:07           ` William Josephson
2003-07-07 15:48         ` rob pike, esq.
2003-07-07 15:58           ` Jack Johnson
2003-07-08  8:32           ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-07-08 10:30             ` boyd, rounin
2003-07-08 11:09               ` matt
2003-07-08 11:36                 ` Dan Cross
2003-07-08 12:12                   ` boyd, rounin
2003-07-08 14:14                     ` ron minnich [this message]
2003-07-08 17:42                 ` chris
2003-07-08 20:19                   ` matt
2003-07-08 20:41                     ` boyd, rounin
2003-07-09 14:58                       ` rog
2003-07-09 19:42                         ` boyd, rounin
2003-07-10 12:30                           ` rog
2003-07-08 22:09                   ` ron minnich
2003-07-08 22:19                     ` Dan Cross
2003-07-09  1:27                       ` ron minnich
2003-07-01 21:46 boyd, rounin
2003-07-02  0:24 boyd, rounin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0307080812450.25149-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov \
    --to=rminnich@lanl.gov \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).