From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: andrey mirtchovski <mirtchov@cpsc.ucalgary.ca>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: NAT'ing a drawterm connection
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0308250804370.1975-100000@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308250717420.3501-100000@fbsd.cpsc.ucalgary.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 07:18:38 -0600
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 212c923c-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Jim Choate wrote:

> It's definitely on our 'To Do' list. Our long term plan is to have an
> encrypted tunnel between each node, with each 'hub' node having a unique
> key pair between it and each member node.
>

why not just update drawterm to 9p2000? :)