From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ron minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] kernel modules
In-Reply-To: <2b7b451e1182a260aa2887e810b907f4@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311100731200.5100-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 07:34:30 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 849db3e6-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Fco.J.Ballesteros wrote:

> Is the complexity added worth? For instance,
> my kernel is a 1.9% of the machine memory?? (maybe a 4%
> while running, but that's in a 128M machine, which
> is pretty low these days).

my modules tree for my laptop, which is hardly complete, is 14MB. Other
machines have 24 MB.

The idea still might work, though. If modules can be avoided that is all
to the good ...

ron