From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrey mirtchovski To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil+fossi=suicide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:32:34 -0700 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 940c2a24-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Is it possible to 'undo' the srv command? Say if a script is used to run replica it could tell fossil to create /srv/replica with -AWP, run pull, remove /srv/replica and tell fossil to remove the posted fd. Running replica on an -AWP-ed fossil fd is really preferable, since things like yesterday permissions changes just don't work in a situation where I do a pull with my user being a member of the sys group. In my case replica was unable to modify the permissions of the files in antiword/ because they are owned by my user locally and by sys on sources, so fossil wouldn't allow a chmod. andrey On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, David Presotto wrote: > with the new fossil (after you get past your linker problems) you can say > 'fsys main srv -AWP unprotected' (actually pick your own name). This > will create a /srv/unprotected for the same file system you are currently > using. You can then mount that and use it to get unprotected access.