From: ron minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] Re: [Etherboot-developers] __unused in arch/i386/include/hooks.h (fwd)
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 10:21:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401181020550.6300-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov> (raw)
given the ongoing discussion of C extensions, I thought this one was a
beaut.
ron
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:32:23 +0000 (GMT)
From: Michael Brown <mbrown@fensystems.co.uk>
To: Etherboot <Etherboot-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Etherboot-developers] __unused in arch/i386/include/hooks.h
(fwd)
Forgot to post this to the list, sorry.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:00:26 +0000 (GMT)
From: Michael Brown <mbrown@fensystems.co.uk>
To: Georg Baum <gbaum@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Etherboot-developers] __unused in arch/i386/include/hooks.h
> Does the __unused attribute in
> void arch_main ( struct Elf_Bhdr * __unused );
> in arch/i386/include/hooks.h have any influence on the generated code?
> I ask because gcc 2.95 does not compile this. It seems that __unused is only
> allowed for function definitions and not declarations. Therefore I would
> like to remove the __unused attribute.
I added that recently in order to remove an unnecessary compiler warning.
I don't see any problem with removing it from the declaration; I assume
that having it present in the definition will serve to inhibit the
warning.
Michael
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Etherboot-developers mailing list
Etherboot-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/etherboot-developers
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-18 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-18 17:21 ron minnich [this message]
2004-01-18 17:09 ` [9fans] Re: [Etherboot-developers] __unused in arch/i386/include/hooks.h mirtchov
2004-01-18 23:20 ` Russ Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0401181020550.6300-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov \
--to=rminnich@lanl.gov \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).