From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ron minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] slow throughput on wavelan/epro100
In-Reply-To: <40271345.8040705@cox.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402082203260.18308-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Sun,  8 Feb 2004 22:04:44 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d3bd7eac-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Chris Van Horne wrote:

> Yep, ether{0,1} are both on IRQ 11.

yeah, that's an amazingly common setup. I'm curious, do you know what the
chipset is? I wonder if Plan 9 did something wrong with the IRQ table
management?

Did you see what the IRQs are on a working OS, or is this IRQ 11 thing
what Plan 9 set up?

ron