From: ron minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] pathetic
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:36:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402260735370.19744-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VcudneFt9KO6-KDdRVn-jQ@comcast.com>
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Douglas A. Gwyn wrote:
> Of course separate I&D doesn't solve buffer overrun problems,
> which can still modify the buggy program's data in ways that
> the programmer did not plan for. The attacker gets less
> control if he can't force-feed instructions, but he can still
> wreak havoc. If nothing else, he can cause denial of service.
That's the best part. They're pumping in 40-year-old ideas, claiming they
are new, and claiming they'll fix something they done.
Still, that's the PC biz for you. Anybody see that picture of Mr. Bill
claiming he will solve the spam problem? quite funny.
ron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-26 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 15:26 ron minnich
2004-02-25 15:41 ` Derek Fawcus
2004-02-25 16:02 ` ron minnich
2004-02-26 1:15 ` Derek Fawcus
2004-02-26 3:45 ` ron minnich
2004-02-26 4:12 ` Derek Fawcus
2004-02-26 6:48 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 6:41 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-25 16:26 ` Aharon Robbins
2004-02-26 6:02 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 10:41 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2004-02-26 11:32 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-02-26 11:33 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 12:39 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-26 12:11 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 13:42 ` dbailey27
2004-02-26 14:36 ` ron minnich [this message]
2004-02-26 14:41 ` David Presotto
2004-02-26 14:40 ` dbailey27
2004-02-26 14:47 ` ron minnich
2004-02-26 14:44 ` dbailey27
2004-02-26 15:28 ` ron minnich
2004-02-26 15:38 ` George Michaelson
2004-02-26 16:16 ` ron minnich
2004-02-26 17:32 ` [9fans] SPF+SMTP C H Forsyth
2004-03-01 10:34 ` [9fans] pathetic Vin McLellan
2004-02-26 15:38 ` dbailey27
2004-02-26 14:58 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-26 15:53 ` dbailey27
2004-02-27 9:01 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-27 10:52 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-27 13:07 ` David Presotto
2004-02-27 20:26 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2004-02-27 22:22 ` Tristan Seligmann
2004-02-27 23:36 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-27 13:42 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-27 15:42 ` a
2004-02-27 17:45 ` 9nut
2004-02-27 23:10 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-29 21:11 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 15:16 ` C H Forsyth
2004-02-26 15:37 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-26 17:55 ` jmk
2004-02-26 19:23 ` Richard Miller
2004-02-26 19:35 ` jmk
2004-02-26 19:50 ` Richard Miller
2004-02-27 11:04 ` Dan Moniz
2004-02-26 20:46 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 15:37 ` Derek Fawcus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0402260735370.19744-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov \
--to=rminnich@lanl.gov \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).