From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ron minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ls, rc question -- proposed change to rc/glob.c 
In-Reply-To: <000b01c40dc7$b8df6e40$1602a8c0@bl.belllabs.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403190843180.13503-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:43:45 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 39e7022a-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, david presotto wrote:

> I wouldn't mind if the kernel threw out the unreachable entries when you
> read a directory.  However, I don't think its worth the effort or the
> likely bugs.  This is what I would change, if anything since it is the
> source of the problem and 'fixing' it in rc just makes rc and globing in
> general odd.

in the mode of lnfs, for people who care, make a uniquefs that enforces 
bsd-like behavior?

ron