From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ron minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] emacs vs plan9
In-Reply-To: <3BC6DE74.67966B77@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404112014080.4420-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 20:14:43 -0600
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 59748054-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Russ Cox wrote:

> are you sure?  plan 9 is typically pretty
> easy to port to a new architecture.

oh, all right, lack of existence does not prove you can't run plan 9 under 
emacs. 

ron