From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ron minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] acme, rio workalike available in plan 9 ports
In-Reply-To: <883be303d77057955c1a22b8d95e2732@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404201309130.15385-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:09:50 -0600
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 63b8a48c-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:

> Plan 9 on the x86 does not do a very good job of managing the TLB, when
> the port was done there was only the option of flushing it entirely. Better
> code for the modern variants may happen.

I'm not being real specific I think. I'm just saying that if you have to 
flush/reload the tlb, it's nicer if your use of tbl is rather small, as it 
is for Plan 9 programs. 

ron