From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:07:12 -0700
From: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>,
	Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] xen progress ...
In-Reply-To: <ee9e417a04112318264521fe1b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411240901120.1285@linux.site>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411231221070.30122@linux.site>
	<ee9e417a04112318264521fe1b@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0bca76f0-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

It turned out to be a misunderstanding in Xen about how to handle writes 
to virtual devices. Long story. Fixed. I'm running acme in a drawterm 
window to Xen under Plan 9.

rio is next.

oh wait, rio works. and acme in a rio window works. 

well, well, well. Now I gotta make it go fast. 

ron