From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:03:42 -0700
From: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: RE: [9fans] http://swtch.com/plan9port/mk-all-20040301.tgz
In-Reply-To: <7DD37218104E31429E79EB0BB136800E11C55A@vargas.ntdom.cupdx>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0501141003290.17396@linux.site>
References: <7DD37218104E31429E79EB0BB136800E11C55A@vargas.ntdom.cupdx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 30bf5778-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025



On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:

> so what's more current these days- plan9port or actual Plan 9?  Last I
> heard, plan9port's Venti was more functional than the real Plan 9
> variety...

goodness. We have to backport from 9ports to Plan 9? 

ron