From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri,  1 Apr 2005 20:55:59 -0700
From: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] ts7200
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504012035380.8967@enigma.lanl.gov>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504012055190.8967@enigma.lanl.gov>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504012035380.8967@enigma.lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3157b6e2-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025



On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Ronald G. Minnich wrote:

> fine until the first Rfork from rc. In other words, all the RTC clock and

sorry, this is supposed to be:
> fine until the first Rfork from rc. In other words, all the RTC clock and
            ^-after

i.e. the Rfork is fine, but the first syscall after the rfork is very, 
very not fine.

ron