From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Sat,  2 Apr 2005 08:50:06 -0700
From: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] OT: programming style under Plan9??
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0504020805500.14813@cps211.cps.cmich.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504020849330.10424@enigma.lanl.gov>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0504012026300.14759@cps211.cps.cmich.edu>
	<ee9e417a05040119546b16d4d1@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0504020805500.14813@cps211.cps.cmich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 319f1654-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025



On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, I RATTAN wrote:

> Does a piece imply that it is/has to be in a file of it's own or in the
> same file with all the other pieces? So, it feels like a style of
> writing code.

I don't know but I think you're splitting hairs. The kernel, last time I 
looked, was in more than one file. I really don't see your point at all. 


ron