From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 13:27:35 -0600
From: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Sleep-complexity
In-Reply-To: <014401c5558e$f82839f0$aafb7d50@kilgore>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505101327250.20942@enigma.lanl.gov>
References: <35f6f399b29a91e456132e3e1a022fc4@plan9.bell-labs.com>
	<014401c5558e$f82839f0$aafb7d50@kilgore>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 494e349c-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025



On Tue, 10 May 2005, boyd, rounin wrote:

> > what was their choice?
> 
> long == 64 bits
> int == 32 bits
> short == 16 bits
> 
> i argued:
> 
> long == 32 bits
> int == 64 bits
> short == 16 bits

IIRC that is what SGI did, correct? 

ron