From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:15:26 -0600
From: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 8c question
In-Reply-To: <a4e6962a05071113056d3720e7@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507111411180.14780@enigma.lanl.gov>
References: <eaf7ffeb94093a1af9c5b04c2c0aa4f9@terzarima.net> 
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0507101853241.12286@enigma.lanl.gov> 
	<a4e6962a050711122327252f90@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0507111355220.14780@enigma.lanl.gov>
	<a4e6962a05071113056d3720e7@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 640ff9dc-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025



On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:

> Oi - my gut is that this sounds wrong.  What would make more sense is
> for #X to look more like devsrv, with the virtual channels representing.  
> Then you could mount /dev/xen/dom0 /n/dom0 and then bind as you like.

Can those channels correspond to the current channels that talk via fifo 
queue to in-kernel linux devices (the so-called backend devices)?

ron